2016 Draft Kit

Week 3 passing and rushing matchups — 2015 fantasy football

It’s still early in the season so straight fantasy points allowed is a bad metric to use when determining matchups.

Anyone who’s played fantasy football long enough has seen a running back stat line with something like four carries for one yard and two touchdowns. Those kinds of performances skew fantasy points allowed greatly. It’s also early in the season, so blowouts can skew FPA even further.

Instead of FPA, I’ve been using Football Outsiders’ excellent Defense-adjusted Value Over Average, or DVOA.

No predictive stat is perfect. If we could all predict the future easily, we’d all be rich on Draft Kings money. But because it looks at performance on individual plays as opposed to a collection of plays, DVOA represents a better predictive statistic than FPA.

This week I thought we should take a look at 2015 DVOA. It should be less finicky than FPA, which starts to become reliable in Week 4, but probably doesn’t really mature until about Week 8.

There are some interesting matchups according to the early 2015 returns, but in the end we’ll probably use a combination of full-season 2014 and early 2015 matchups to determine our rankings and lineups this week.

Let’s take a look at this week’s matchups.

Week 3 final rankings — QB, RB, WR, TE, FLEX, K, DEF

Week 3 early rankings — Quarterback, running back, wide receiver, tight end, flex, kicker, defense

Game-day weather | Projected scores/Las Vegas | Waiver wire gems |

Passing and rushing matchups | All Week 3 content

Week 3 sleepers and values: Draft Kings | FanDuel

Week 3 passing matchups (2015 stats)

Passing/avoid Opp 2014   Passing/attack Opp 2014
Detroit Lions (DET) DEN BUF Seattle Seahawks (SEA) CHI WAS
New Orleans Saints (NO) CAR CLE Carolina Panthers (CAR) NO ATL
Indianapolis Colts (IND) TEN SEA Cleveland Browns (CLE) OAK PIT
Philadelphia Eagles (PHI) NYJ SF Tennessee Titans (TEN) IND CHI
DEN Chicago Bears (CHI) SEA OAK
St. Louis Rams (STL) PIT NO
Denver Broncos (DEN) DET TEN
Arizona Cardinals (ARI) SF SD
NYJ
TB

The first thing we need to talk about is why the Seahawks defenses is on the wrong side of the chart.

Their play so far this season indicates Seattle is a vulnerable pass defense, which makes the Bears a sneaky play. However, Kam Chancellor is expected to end his holdout and join the Seahawks this week. That should transform them back into a dominant force.

We probably shouldn’t start Jimmy Clausen if he was starting against anyone, let alone Seattle.

OK, with that out of the way, let’s talk about the rest of the matchups.

Denver is the only dominant passing defense from last season that is currently playing that way this season. That makes the Lions, especially with a questionable Matthew Stafford, a shaky play this week.

It looks like Drew Brees has hit the age wall. He’ll certainly have some good weeks, but I suspect we’ll get more of the roller coaster we were on last season. This week, against a Panthers team that’s been defending the pass well, I’ll pass on Brees.

You aren’t going to sit Andrew Luck or his weapons regardless of what these charts say. The Titans have apparently gone from a pass defense to attack to one to avoid. The Jets, too, which means Sam Bradford, DeMarco Murray and the beleaguered Eagles offense may not be able to get back on track for another week.

Like the Seahawks, San Francisco went from a team to avoid in 2014, to one to attack in 2015. But unlike Seattle, I think the 49ers are a target. They had so much roster turnover and, as I’ve said before, I really like the Carson Palmer-led Cardinals this season. Expect to see Palmer among our top-5 quarterbacks this week.

Speaking of early rankings — they’ll be out tomorrow, by the way — Russell Wilson, with the top matchup of the week, is a top-3 QB and Cam Newton is seventh, thanks largely to these matchups.

Week 3 rushing matchups (2015 stats)

Rushing/avoid Opp 2014   Rushing/attack Opp 2014
Philadelphia Eagles (PHI) NYJ DET Kansas City Chiefs (KC) GB NO
N. England Patriots (NE) JAC SEA Jacksonville Jags (JAC) NE CLE
Green Bay Packers (GB) KC DEN Arizona Cardinals (ARI) SF ATL
Atlanta Falcons (ATL) DAL STL San Diego Chargers (SD) MIN TEN
San Francisco 49ers (SF) ARI PHI Seattle Seahawks (SEA) CHI
St. Louis Rams (STL) PIT Miami Dolphins (MIA) BUF
Baltimore Ravens (BAL) CIN
New York Giants (NYG) WAS
Tennessee Titans (TEN) IND
New York Jets (NYJ) PHI
Washington (WAS) NYG
Buffalo Bills (BUF) MIA

We’ve said in the past good run defenses typically stay good and bad run defenses typically stay bad.

Despite new teams on both lists, we don’t have the complete 360-degree swaps we had in the passing matchups.

I also suspect this list isn’t as reliable as I had hoped. After this week, there will be fewer names on the left and the Seahawks, with Chancellor back, will likely return to the avoid ranks. For instance, if New England gets up big on the Jaguars, they’ll likely lean on the rushing game to close out the win, pushing Jacksonville further down or even off the list.

Similarly, despite the ranking, I’m not going to draft T.J. Yeldon in every daily fantasy league because this matchup says the Patriots are bad against the run. The Jaguars will likely be behind by a significant amount, meaning they’ll have to abandon the run early.

This list also says the Giants “defense” is effective against the run. Giants, defense and effective should not be used together in the same sentence in 2015. I wouldn’t be surprised if Alfred Morris and Matt Jones put up big numbers this week.

Now that I’ve poked holes in the 2015 lists, here are the matchups using full-season 2014 DVOA ratings. Again, we’ll be using both to determine our rankings and to build our lineups this week:

Week 3 passing matchups (2014)

Passing/avoid 2014   Passing/attack 2014
Miami Dolphins (MIA) BUF New York Giants (NYG) WAS
Oakland Raiders (OAK) CLE Dallas Cowboys (DAL) ATL
Chicago Bears (CHI) SEA St. Louis Rams (STL) PIT
Arizona Cardinals (ARI) SF Seattle Seahawks (SEA) CHI
Detroit Lions (DET) DEN Cleveland Browns (CLE) OAK
Carolina Panthers (CAR) NO
Indianapolis Colts (IND) TEN
Minnesota Vikings (MIN) SD
Philadelphia Eagles (PHI) NYJ
Houston Texans (HOU) TB

Both Wilson and Newton are still on the board. So are Nick Foles and Josh McCown.

All four of those quarterbacks will get slight bumps because of their presence on both lists.

Meanwhile, I’m going to recommend we stay away from all pieces of the Lions passing attack in daily fantasy. You must start Calvin Johnson in your season-long league because he’s Calvin Johnson.

Week 3 rushing matchups (2014)

Rushing/avoid 2014   Rushing/attack 2014
Denver Broncos (DEN) DET Carolina Panthers (CAR) NO
Chicago Bears (CHI) SEA Oakland Raiders (OAK) CLE
Detroit Lions (DET) DEN Dallas Cowboys (DAL) ATL
Pittsburgh Steelers (PIT) STL Indianapolis Colts (IND) TEN
New York Jets (NYJ) PHI

Like we said above, there’s no crossover in the rushing ranks between 2014 and 2015, so we’ll probably take the rankings on a case-by-case basis.

One nice thing is that we know running backs like Matt Forte and Le’Veon Bell will provide value despite the matchups because of their catching ability.

On the positive matchup side, the Panthers — running quarterback Newton, in particular — are shaping up for a big game against the Saints.

It’ll be interesting to see if Dallas unleashes Christine Michael this week. I put in waiver claims on him in a couple places this week, especially on teams where I already own Joe Randle. It’s a lottery ticket, but if he hits big where Randle and Darren McFadden have failed he could be the top waiver wire running back of the season.

Tennessee goes from a defense to avoid, according to 2015 stats, to an all-Colts-on-deck defense, according to 2014. As usual, the truth will likely be somewhere in the middle. The Titans defense has done a good job so far this season, but those games were Jameis Winston‘s disastrous debut and last week’s oddball Johnny Manziel game — 8-for-15, 172-yard, 2-TDs.

After the game against Indianapolis this week, we should have a better indication whether Tennessee’s defense is truly effective or if it has benefitted from its opponents.





Comments are currently closed.



%d bloggers like this: